Meta-Argumentation Modelling I: Methodology and Techniques

نویسندگان

  • Guido Boella
  • Dov M. Gabbay
  • Leon van der Torre
  • Serena Villata
چکیده

In this paper, we introduce the methodology and techniques of metaargumentation to model argumentation. The methodology of meta-argumentation instantiates Dung’s abstract argumentation theory with an extended argumentation theory, and is thus based on a combination of the methodology of instantiating abstract arguments, and the methodology of extending Dung’s basic argumentation frameworks with other relations among abstract arguments. The technique of meta-argumentation applies Dung’s theory of abstract argumentation to itself, by instantiating Dung’s abstract arguments with meta-arguments using a technique called flattening. We characterize the domain of instantiation using a representation technique based on soundness and completeness. Finally, we distinguish among various instantiations using the technique of specification

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Deployment of Interpretive Structural Modelling Methodology in Supply Chain Management –An overview

Abstract Purpose-The purpose of this paper is to review a sample of the literature relating to Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) and its deployment for modelling purposes in the area of supply chain management (SCM). Design/methodology/approach- The literature is examined from the three perspectives. First, concept of ISM and examines ISM as modelling technique. Second, use of ISM by ...

متن کامل

Assessing Arguments in the Abstract: Some Problems with Argumentation Frameworks

Argumentation frameworks are logic systems that assess collections of conflicting arguments generated from a set of potentially inconsistent factual and rule-based premises. Argumentationframeworks weredevelopedinresponsetocriticisms that traditional formal logic did not do justice to the adversarial nature of legal reasoning, and that it ignored the problems caused by the ambiguity of language...

متن کامل

Reliability Modelling of the Redundancy Allocation Problem in the Series-parallel Systems and Determining the System Optimal Parameters

Considering the increasingly high attention to quality, promoting the reliability of products during designing process has gained significant importance. In this study, we consider one of the current models of the reliability science and propose a non-linear programming model for redundancy allocation in the series-parallel systems according to the redundancy strategy and considering the assump...

متن کامل

Modelling Decision Problems Via Birkhoff Polyhedra

A compact formulation of the set of tours neither in a graph nor its complement is presented and illustrates a general methodology proposed for constructing polyhedral models of decision problems based upon permutations, projection and lifting techniques. Directed Hamilton tours on n vertex graphs are interpreted as (n-1)- permutations. Sets of extrema of Birkhoff polyhedra are mapped to tours ...

متن کامل

A Distributed Argumentation Framework using Defeasible Logic Programming ( Extended Version )

Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP) by García and Simari is an approach to realise non-monotonic reasoning via dialectical argumentation. We extend their approach by explicitly supporting distributed entities in the argumentation process on a structural basis. This makes the modelling of distributed argumentation systems like a jury court by using DeLP techniques possible. In this framework pos...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Studia Logica

دوره 93  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2009